
It never fails -- every Christmas season, some group or individual gets a huge boost of news by attacking the religious context of the holiday. Trying to take the "Christ" out of Christmas, and soforth. I usually find it amusing, as if protesters started an effort to remove any mention of me come May 31st each year, but keep the rest of the birthday intact. To do it for its own sake.
When you remove God from the equation of life, what you're left with is a mobius loop of doing things for their own sake, with things giving themselves meaning. The American Humanist Association's started an ad campaign with the slogan of
"Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness' sake." which illustrates this point perfectly. Who needs God? We can be "good" without God, right? Just do it for its own sake!
Not to be smarmy or anything, but this is a campaign designed by someone who has a third grade understanding of how the world works. I should be good, just because? Why? Because it's good? If I'm not deriving my morality from God, then what do I have to fall back on -- the government's sense of morality? The popular majority? My own relative sense of right and wrong?
Humanism is a loose philosophy that essentially says that we as people have the ability to better ourselves -- and that we don't need religion or God to aid us in that. We can rationally deduce what is "good" and what is "bad" by observing the world, then choosing "good" to better the world for ourselves and those around us. An example of humanism that I'm pretty familiar with is the core of Star Trek, which Gene Roddenberry designed to be a universe where mankind has bettered itself through humanist actions, where religion is passé, and where all anyone needs to do is to go forth and preach the good news of how awesome people are so that not-as-good people can wake up and start being good for goodness' sake.
If humanism asks me to view things rationally, then fine, I will: this is an incredibly silly philosophy because it is not backed up by the world historically. People just are
not good for goodness' sake, ever. We are not "basically good" at our core -- we are selfish, sinful and hostile to our neighbors. We're out for ourselves. If you can look at me and say, with a straight face, that we as human society have evolved to a better sense of morality on our own, then I'll applaud your optimism and ignorance of the sheer amount of killing and evil that's happened in the 20th century versus anything back in the "dark days" a thousand, two thousand, three thousand years ago.
This ad campaign isn't a call for Christians to be riled up to anger over an attack at the core of truth -- after all, that's been going on since the dawn of time. But it is a call for us to shore up our beliefs and not bend when someone approaches us with a humanist argument -- that we do not need God to be good. Once you buy into that, you've thrown aside the whole of the Bible; God's message to His children is that we are simply incapable of being good through our own ability. We need God's grace to save us, we need His forgiveness to wash us clean, and we need His strength to help us overcome temptation and sinful influences in order to be made more and more Christlike in our daily lives.
Humanists hate verses like
Romans 3:23, because they claim that God is beating us down, making us feel guilty, making us feel inadequate. But it is the truth that "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God" -- and it is equally true that this verse is smack-dab in the middle of a passage wherein God demonstrates how much He loves us despite this failing, and how He's provided a way for our salvation and redemption.
The point to my life isn't that I'm doing things just for the sake of them. That's empty and without purpose. Instead, my faith and life in God gives me supreme context and purpose for all I do -- when I do good, it is for His glory and kingdom, and when I do bad, it is because I am a sinner who is still being sanctified.
Why believe in God? Because I do good for His sake, not my own.